logoalt Hacker News

Nifty3929yesterday at 5:10 PM2 repliesview on HN

Because recognizing the author as conflicted and an unreliable narrator changes how you should weight and consider the information they are providing. It doesn't necessarily mean anything is untrue - but it does add extra, valuable information to how much you trust it.

If someone tells me something, I'm mostly likely to believe it without further investigation. But not always.


Replies

jmullyesterday at 5:22 PM

Another one. Deflecting the criticism of Meta with a “whaddabout the author!”

Formed as an answer to a question, but not one that was asked.

A different account than last time, though, so I’ll ask you too: Why do the dark work of deflecting on behalf of Meta (lol)?

show 3 replies
croesyesterday at 6:00 PM

The fate of every whistleblower