She didn’t have to agree to the contract. I don’t really want some arbitrary govt limit restricting what private parties can do with each other.
I’m certain that if these clauses were banned, exactly zero contracts that would otherwise have been agreed would be abandoned. They are completely one sided, and superfluous to the goals of the contract.
> I don’t really want some arbitrary govt limit restricting what private parties can do with each other.
Given that this runs tangential with whistleblowing and free speech, this is exactly where I want a government to draw a line.
The only way these sorts of contracts can be enforced is if private parties have recourse to government powers- civil courts- to enforce them.
Governments could just not help them do that.
I very much want the government restricting employment-related contracts myself.
And NDAs and similar, with their entire purpose being restricting speech, should also be restricted pretty strongly.