The article tries to sell it to people who can't run Docker locally (e.g. locked down permissions in enterprise environments, slow old laptop), b hasn't it already been possible to use remote Docker engines?
So the news is that they're ogfering to host those remotes now, right?
alt Hacker News
The article tries to sell it to people who can't run Docker locally (e.g. locked down permissions in enterprise environments, slow old laptop), b hasn't it already been possible to use remote Docker engines?
So the news is that they're ogfering to host those remotes now, right?