It's not at all like that?
Claiming that a system's purpose is something it consistently fails to do is absurd. Intentions don't matter, outcomes matter.
This is a pretty basic systems theorist argument, to be honest...
A systems purpose depends on its creator. Creators regularly fail to produce intended results. It’s absurd to say an unintended result is the intended result
A systems purpose depends on its creator. Creators regularly fail to produce intended results. It’s absurd to say an unintended result is the intended result