alt Hacker NewsThe actual revocation needn't be secure. False revocations are an oxymoron.
The practice around revocations need to be secure of course, but that's more on an engineering problem than a cryptographical.
The actual revocation needn't be secure. False revocations are an oxymoron.
The practice around revocations need to be secure of course, but that's more on an engineering problem than a cryptographical.
Can you explain a bit more what you mean by "secure" in the context of "actual revocations"? The oxymoronic nature isn't self-evident enough for me to catch your intended meaning before my first cup of coffee.