alt Hacker News> Updating websites is going to be so much easier than dealing with other systems (bitcoin probably the worst; data at rest storage systems; hardware).
IPv6 deserves a prominent spot there
> Updating websites is going to be so much easier than dealing with other systems (bitcoin probably the worst; data at rest storage systems; hardware).
IPv6 deserves a prominent spot there
Does it? That one is different because IPv4 with CGNAT largely "just works" except for P2P type stuff. As a result there's a strong incentive for anyone who has a working setup to just not care.
I can use myself as an example here. IPv6 is supported by all my hardware, all the software I use, and my ISP provides it. Yet my LAN intentionally remains IPv4 only with NAT. Why? Because adding IPv6 to my LAN would require nonzero effort on my part and has (at least for now) quite literally zero upside for me. If I ever need something it offers I will switch to it but that hasn't happened yet.
PQC is entirely different in that the existence of a CRQC immediately breaks the security guarantee.