alt Hacker NewsI think we all agree with that statement.
What we might not agree with is specifically what "informed" or "egregious" might mean.
I think we all agree with that statement.
What we might not agree with is specifically what "informed" or "egregious" might mean.
I actually think "informed" is almost definitely defined already. Doctors already need to provide informed consent, so I think it would borrow from that. As for "egregious", I also suspect that this is understood already in a similar vein, but perhaps not - I'd suggest that this is effectively "would near definitively cause imminent harm".
FWIW I do not think that most people agree with this.