logoalt Hacker News

sixothreeyesterday at 8:17 PM3 repliesview on HN

Say what you want about an old laptop, they sure are a lot faster than a $150/mo azure VM. And to be clear, I mean a _LOT_ faster.


Replies

notpushkintoday at 7:47 AM

All the big 3 cloud providers suck if you use them purely as VPS. I’ve tried AWS Lightsail (basically, slightly cheaper EC2) and it’s so much slower than what I’d expect from a similar spec VM from a normal hosting provider.

Hetzner, DigitalOcean, OVH, Vultr are some of the better-known ones. Personally, I’m very happy with SSD Nodes. Paying $90/yr for a 4 vCPU¹ / 16 GB / 320 GB SSD, had some downtime exactly once in two years (they’ve had to switch their IPv4 space in Tokyo). Affiliate link: https://ale.sh/r/ssdnodes

[1]: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 (4) @ 2.199GHz – not great, I know, but to reiterate: that’s for $90 a year.

kingstnaptoday at 1:07 AM

I looked it up for specifics.

Right now the closest I can see is that $121/mo gets you 4 Xeon Platinum 8370C cores and 16GiB of RAM [0] (storage not included!).

Somebody Geekbenched that config here [1] 1274 single core 4256 multi core.

Thats kinda terrible ngl. A mini pc with last gen mobile parts like Ryzen 5 7640HS gets 2610 single and 10768 multi core [2].

[0] https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/virtual-ma...

[1] https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/17547159

[2] https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/17541586

hsbauauvhabzbyesterday at 9:06 PM

That’s saying a lot about azure, not the laptops.