Yeah. I do wish there was something that was like Clojure with a TypeScript or Go-like nominal typing, but I do feel myself missing types a lot less with Clojure compared to other languages.
Type annotations mix poorly with s-expressions imo. Try an ML, which answers the same question of "How do we represent the lambda calculus as a programming language?"
Type annotations mix poorly with s-expressions imo. Try an ML, which answers the same question of "How do we represent the lambda calculus as a programming language?"