logoalt Hacker News

shash • yesterday at 4:56 AM • 2 replies • view on HN

Is 12 enough of a sample size to make a statistical judgement? What if there were 20 more which didn’t have a loss of life? Is it then 1/30? What if there were 20 more?

The risk factor is calculated _per mission_ from what I understand. You can have three accidents in a row and nothing for decades but the risk itself can still be 1 in 30.

Replies

the__alchemist • yesterday at 11:43 AM

Your point is fair and and important distinction. I think when estimating a risk factor though, this empirical data, while a low sample size, is a valuable statistic because it's empirical, and not that small of a sample size. Maybe going forward, we have 3 risk levels:

  - Historical. Low N as you say. (Even though each mission and spacecraft is different and they're spread out over time, there's value in this)
  - Bureaucrat number; absurdly low, but looks good to politicians etc
  - Engineering estimate
➕ show 1 reply
stetrain • yesterday at 5:01 AM

So the risk factor for Apollo could have actually been 1/1000 but they were just really unlucky?

➕ show 1 reply