logoalt Hacker News

everdrivetoday at 2:49 PM4 repliesview on HN

Seems nice but is actually a terrible move. It's another step towards the presumption that everyone should have a smartphone.


Replies

HarHarVeryFunnytoday at 3:40 PM

That's like saying that using tax dollars to pay for roads assumes that everyone has a car.

MOST people do use things like government/taxpayer funded roads, public transportation, water, healthcare, etc that are considered as basic necessities.

As far as everyone needing a smartphone, or e-mail address, that ship has already sailed. Here in the US, try using "Parkmobile" without a mobile phone.

show 5 replies
ianm218today at 5:32 PM

I feel like you are applying a US specific/ western lense to this. In East Asian countries they’ve built lots of infrastructure around that presumption already and are committed to it.

kube-systemtoday at 3:30 PM

Communication access is a universal need and does not necessarily require smartphone usage. The US has had universal access programs since at least the mid 80s

fellowmartiantoday at 7:18 PM

Everyone should have a smartphone, just not necessarily a closed down and enshittified one.