> Most programmers are bad at detecting UB and memory ownership and lifetime errors.

And this is why we have languages and tooling that takes care of it.

There's only a handful of people who can one-shot perfect code in a language that doesn't guard against memory ownership or lifetime errors every time.

But even the crappiest programmer has to actually work against the tooling in a language like Rust to ownership issues. Add linters, formatters and unit tests on top of that and it becomes nigh-impossible.

Now put an LLM in the same position, it's also unable to create shitty code when the tooling prevents it from doing so.