logoalt Hacker News

Dibby053yesterday at 5:09 PM3 repliesview on HN

Going to play devil's advocate here but I suspect if Cloudflare had been more cooperative about taking down illegal content, LaLiga would not have resorted to blanket blocking individual IPs.

I would really like to understand more about the process that they should follow but didn't / followed but didn't satisfy them / doesn't exist, in order to remove infringing websites quickly from CloudFlare.


Replies

integralidyesterday at 8:29 PM

I work with actually malicious content (things that make people lose their life savings) and Cloudflare abuse is relatively helpful (compared to most ISPs who just don't care).

They just refuse to take down random things that some media company representatives send their way, without a court order or any oversight. And this is a good thing.

show 1 reply
JoshTriplettyesterday at 7:11 PM

LaLiga wanted the right to tell Cloudflare to block specific sites without going through a court.

Cloudflare, rightfully, said that was ridiculous and unreasonable.

A Spanish court, wrongfully, decided to let LaLiga block all of Cloudflare.

show 1 reply
lokaryesterday at 6:44 PM

They will take down anything you get a judge to agree with.