logoalt Hacker News

littlestymaarlast Sunday at 6:27 PM2 repliesview on HN

The definition of “major accident” used in nuclear is orders of magnitude more strict than in any other industries though, which distort the picture.

The worst nuclear accident involving a nuclear plant (Chernobyl, which occurred in a country without regulation for all intent and purpose) killed less people than the food processing industry cause every year (and I'm not counting long term health effect of junk food, just contamination incidents in the processing units leading to deadly intoxications of consumers).

In countries with regulations there's been 2 “major accidents”: TMI killed no one, Fukushima killed 1 guy and injured 24, in the plant itself. In any industries that would be considered workplace safety violation, not “major accident”… And it occurred in the middle of, and because, a tsunami which killed 19000!

I'm actually happy this regulation exist because that's why there ate so little accidents, but claiming that it's still hazardous despite the regulations is preposterous.


Replies

Tepixtoday at 10:57 AM

> The definition of “major accident” used in nuclear is orders of magnitude more strict than in any other industries though, which distort the picture.

What would your definition of a "major incident" be for photovoltaics?

watwutlast Sunday at 7:34 PM

I am pretty sure we dont need to evacuate large areas and keep sarcofag over former food processing plants.

The chernobyl was poisoning Russian soldiers by the start of Ukrainian invasion when they were dumb enough to sleep there.

show 2 replies