That's why I mentioned expected values. Historical data alone is too sparse.

I don't doubt that that resulting number is still very low, or there (being intentionally optimistic about politics and society here) wouldn't be any nuclear plants.

Especially long-term storage is tricky, and if you need to consider time horizons of millenia, even small risks add up.

> Significantly more people have died installing solar panels by falling off of roofs.

In fairness, you then also have to consider "regular" industrial accidents at nuclear plants, which are probably still much lower (due to the presumably much higher energy output per employee hour than other forms). But that's besides the larger point of low probability and historical risk.

Just because you can't prove that a cancer was caused by a nuclear plant doesn't mean it wasn't the cause.

Just from statistics, it's certain that some of the unaccounted deaths were caused by radiation.

Nobody has died from nuclear accidents. If we’re including workers falling off of roofs then we should include nuclear power plant workers dying from mundane industrial accidents which has happened in the US.