logoalt Hacker News

croteyesterday at 6:38 AM3 repliesview on HN

The hard part is doing so without completely ruining the existing app ecosystem. Rosetta 2 is genuinely impressive.


Replies

codeptualizeyesterday at 6:17 PM

Exactly this! Rosetta + the whole app developer community who really quickly released builds for M chips (voluntary or forced, but it did happen).

I had the initial m1 air, and it was remarkable how useable it was. You'd expect all sorts of friction and issue but mostly things just worked (very fast). Even with some Rosetta overhead it was still fast compared to intel macs.

oarsinsyncyesterday at 7:30 AM

Rosetta 1 delivered 50-80% of the performance of native, during the PPC->Intel transition. It turns out, you can deliver not particularly impressive performance and still not ruin your app ecosystem, because developers have to either update to target your new platform, or leave your platform entirely.

You can also voluntarily cut off huge chunks of your own app ecosystem intentionally, by giving up 32bit support and requiring everything to be 64bit capable.

...because users have no other choice when only one vendor controls the both the hardware+software. They can either use the apps still available to them, or they can leave. And the cost of leaving for users is a lot higher.

lern_too_spelyesterday at 3:48 PM

Vs. FEX and Prism?

show 1 reply