It's history of ideas. What Graeber says is ultimately aligned to this, as I pointed out in a sibling thread.
Yes, and your comment makes clear you haven't actually read Graeber and mischaracterized his work.
Anyhow, replying is clearly past the point of utility here.
Yes, and your comment makes clear you haven't actually read Graeber and mischaracterized his work.
Anyhow, replying is clearly past the point of utility here.