I'm trying to understand the argument here. Are you saying that never releasing convicted criminals would completely eliminate crime?
That doesn't seem correct, even leaving aside the obvious moral issues with that.
Not never releasing convicted criminals, but 1) not letting any crime go without at least 1 day in jail 2) doubling the penalty on each successive offense would incapacitate a huge number of serial offenders
My interpretation was that they were saying Flock were criminals who should be sent away for good. I don't know if that's right but it would be consistent that way.