It’s unclear where the 30,000 comes from because the article doesn’t cite a source for that number. You’re drawing an unsubstantiated connection between two (or more?) articles so you can invoke and then discredit a specific reporter.
At this point I’m not sure what you are even talking about but you seem to have an agenda.
Read the references which I carefully included to avoid "Source?" comments.
What reporter is being discredited? The fashion blogger? She was thoroughly discredited by The Grayzone.
At this point I'm not sure what else to add help you overcome your reading comprehension issues.