> Follow along so you can trust the work

> (…) you can verify each step and revert edits if needed.

I wish there were different workflows.

It feels like current most popular way of working with GenAI requires the operator to perform significant QA. The net time savings are usually positive. But it still feels inefficient, risky and frustrating, especially with more complex and/or niche problem areas.

Are there GenAI products that focus more on skill enhancement than replacement? Or any other workflows that improve reliability?