While that might be true, for as long as its name is “.cpp”, people are going to think it’s a C++ library and avoid it.
It would make sense to just make the GUI a separate project, they could call it llama.gui.
This is correct, and I avoided it for this reason, did not have the bandwidth to get into any cpp rabbit hole so just used whatever seemed to abstract it away.
This is the first I'm learning that it isn't just a C++ library.
In fact the first line of the wikipedia article is:
> llama.cpp is an open source software library