alt Hacker NewsThe question is what "complex" means. Complex for us doesn't mean it's complex for LLM. And vice-versa. So I wouldn't value this approach at all.
The question is what "complex" means. Complex for us doesn't mean it's complex for LLM. And vice-versa. So I wouldn't value this approach at all.
I disagree. Much of what makes software complex for us, makes it complex for LLM just as well. E.g:
- a very large codebase
- a codebase which is not modularized into cohesive parts
- niche languages or frameworks
- overly 'clever' code