logoalt Hacker News

geremiiahyesterday at 2:56 PM6 repliesview on HN

> This tech is 100% aligned with the goals of the 0.001% that own and control it

If AI is smart enough to replace the 99.999% it's also smart enough to replace the 0.001%.


Replies

layer8yesterday at 3:08 PM

That fact doesn’t prevent the 0.001% from continuing to control it.

show 1 reply
acdhayesterday at 3:23 PM

Yes, but that isn’t the question as long as those wealthy people control most of the system: companies aren’t going to lose executives, they’ll shed the jobs which they don’t respect. Someone wealthy does not need to accept a bad deal to avoid sleeping on thr street. It’s everyone who isn’t insulated who has to actually compete for work.

show 1 reply
yubblegumyesterday at 3:01 PM

I have given this serious thought over the years. I even have an unfinished novel exactly around that topic.

Energy. The key is controlling their access to energy.

archagonyesterday at 5:56 PM

The 0.001% has a controlling stake in AI, so they're in the clear.

The 99.999% needs to assert their controlling stake in the technology. I don't know what this looks like. Maybe ubiquitous unionizing, coupled with a fully public and openly-trained LLM.

show 3 replies
woraceyesterday at 3:50 PM

IMO this is a common trap. Certainly there's no boundary of cognitive capability that separates capitalist elites from those below them in terms of an AI's ability to outperform them.

But that doesn't really matter when we talk about "replacement" because these people don't "do" they simply "own".

They're not concerned about being outpaced at some skill they perform in exchange for money...they just need the productive output of their capital invested in servers/models/etc to go up.

show 1 reply
bauerdyesterday at 3:14 PM

No because the technology will be used against you.