The evidence is that the article’s writing is terrible. It repeats the same rhetorical devices over and over, dressing up a series of facts in false profundity, because there’s no actual authorial insight here. It’s just “write a well-researched article that demonstrates how ahead of its time the Ada language was” + matmul.

I think the quoted word salad is plenty of evidence.

The combination of emdashes and inane non-sequiturs in "These are not X. They're Y" style is pretty damning.

[dead]