logoalt Hacker News

Lerctoday at 3:04 AM5 repliesview on HN

The shovels and labour used to make those things where not depreciated.

The GPUs are the shovels, not the project. AI at any capability will retain that capbibilty forever. It only gets reduced in value by superior developments. Which are built upon technologies that the previous generation developed.


Replies

kennywinkertoday at 5:53 AM

Calling the GPUs the shovels is bonkers because a) shovels are cheap, GPUs are not. And b) when you build a bridge the bridge doesn’t need shovels to be passable. Without GPUs, the datacenter is useless, the model is useless, etc.

If anything, the GPUs are the steel that the bridge is made of. Each beam can be replaced, but if too many fail the bridge is impassible. A bridge with a 6 year lifespan for each beam is insane.

show 2 replies
loandbeholdtoday at 3:32 AM

You need to separate training and inference usage of GPUs for this analysis.

show 1 reply
jiggawattstoday at 3:11 AM

> retain that capbibilty forever

Not really. The base training data cutoff will quickly render models useless as they fail to keep up with developments.

Translating some Farsi news articles about the war was hilarious, Gemini Pro got into a panic. ChatGPT either accused me of spreading fake news, or assumed this was some sort of fantasy scenario.

show 2 replies