> this won't replace Figma or designers
If every designer takes less time to do their job, you need less designers. There’s no getting around that simple math.
Which is why compilers decimated the software industry.
Except there is getting around that simple math. Did you consider Jevons paradox? If design becomes more efficient, it will be used in more cases, and in return there will be more demand!
As if designers spend most of their time actually "designing". Same flaw of thinking with programmers and AI replacing their jobs. As if the main problem (and a major time waster) is actually programming and not dealing with a million of other things.