logoalt Hacker News

bcjdjsndontoday at 11:36 AM1 replyview on HN

> So the alternative is installing questionable drivers from questionable websites that give an attacker full-access to the entire computer. This is far less good for security, and is unfortunately the norm right now

WebUSB isn't a driver, it relies on underlying usb drivers. What is the need here for a webpage that also needs to access specific hardware not exposed generically?


Replies

leptonstoday at 5:16 PM

>WebUSB isn't a driver, it relies on underlying usb drivers.

I never said WebUSB "was a driver". But it does not rely on specific usb device drivers being installed for specific devices.

>What is the need here for a webpage that also needs to access specific hardware not exposed generically?

There are already plenty. You don't need to ask me because you'll likely just shit on what I write, so here's a list compiled by someone else:

https://github.com/webusb/awesome

That just scratches the surface.

I'm more interested in WebBluetooth, which Apple is also blocking from standardization. I manufacture a bluetooth enabled device that I'd like to have a simple web application to interface with, rather than needing to pay Apple for the privledge to develop an app for their app store, where they can then extort me for $$$ for any sales made through the app.

It's no different for WebUSB, it has many, many uses, but Apple is choosing profit over progress.