alt Hacker News> Our creative team may use AI tools in the production of certain visual material, but the creative direction and editorial judgment are human-driven.
How is this different from anyone else publishing AI slop images on their blog? Those people also direct the AI through prompting and evaluate the results.
I mean, use AI images, so long as they are not crap, but why keep up this charade of "we're authoring the slop".
They explicitly call out what they mean by this in the comments. In this case, they are calling out tools that have been around for a long time that some would consider AI rather than just ML. What specifically from the examples do you disagree with?