logoalt Hacker News

delusionaltoday at 6:12 AM2 repliesview on HN

Is all data about you "surveillance". When your doctor produces a medical record after your visit, are they "surveilling" you? How about when the railway company stores your travels to bill you later?

I'll assume your answer is no, and I that case surely you must see the value in that medical record being correct.


Replies

choo-ttoday at 6:34 AM

Are you equaling mass surveillance to a doctor keeping track of your health for diagnostic accuracy purpose ?

Concerning the railway example, they only need to store how much I owe them, not my travels. Storing travel history on their end is already surveillance.

Data keeping purpose and consents are what make something surveillance or not. Forcing every citizen to use ID to access the web is surveillance plain and simple.

show 1 reply
harvey9today at 7:06 AM

Since you are bringing a semantic argument you might like to know that your doctor does in fact surveil you, hence the term "public health surveillance"

show 1 reply