alt Hacker NewsHow is this relevant? Just because you disagree with some vague connection between two entities doesn't give you the right to destroy property. That's the definition of a childish tantrum. Inflicting blind pain on random, unrelated people because you don't get your way.
Replies
shadowgovt • yesterday at 6:57 PM
There's a rhetorical dodge in this argument where it transitioned from talking about property destruction to talking about harming people.
One can cause the other, but the burden of proof is on the claimant that wrecking a mass-produced special purpose autonomous vehicle did more tangible harm to a human being than make some engineer sad before they rolled up their sleeves and built a replacement.
The Waymo emphatically did not care it was destroyed.
rexpop • today at 5:27 AM
[dead]
ch4s3 • yesterday at 6:33 PM
[flagged]
It's relevant because Waymo is Google