> we started working on path to multi cloud.
Is this microsoft stating that they aren't able to get acceptable reliability from Azure? (I mean, I think a lot of us have heard that, but it's interesting to hear it from microsoft themselves).
I think this is more tailored towards enterprise clients that lose money when Github is down, that would probably help with retention.
Seems pretty sensible to not rely on a single provider for their large complex system?
The entire concept of multi cloud is amusing if you think what cloud originally was supposed to be. They could call them meta clouds (might infringe trademarks), and with the current growth trajectory of AI generated code eventually multi-meta-clouds, renamed to beyond-clouds, and then multi-beyond-clounds. I see no limits.
It’s pretty damning. But as someone who has used Azure, I buy it.