This question has been answered several times on the thread already: because glyphosate is more benign, and relatively more inert, than other herbicides. The case for it is not complicated.
> This question has been answered several times on the thread already
Yet you continue to respond. So why mention it?
> because glyphosate is more benign, and relatively more inert, than other herbicides
Except for the fact you have to use genetically modified crop seeds to survive it. Do other herbicides require this?
> The case for it is not complicated.
The case against it isn't either.
> This question has been answered several times on the thread already
Yet you continue to respond. So why mention it?
> because glyphosate is more benign, and relatively more inert, than other herbicides
Except for the fact you have to use genetically modified crop seeds to survive it. Do other herbicides require this?
> The case for it is not complicated.
The case against it isn't either.