logoalt Hacker News

nadermxyesterday at 6:14 PM6 repliesview on HN

Funny how the copyright industry was able to spin copyright infringment into the pejorative "stealing". If you still have the item, what was stolen?

Dowling v. United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985): The Supreme Court ruled that the unauthorized sale of phonorecords of copyrighted musical compositions does not constitute "stolen, converted or taken by fraud" goods under the National Stolen Property Act


Replies

tensoryesterday at 6:30 PM

I still find the idea that "learning" from code is "stealing" kind of ridiculous.

show 7 replies
NewsaHackOtoday at 12:20 AM

Everybody has had a complete 180 in terms of copyright protections. Before, nobody cared about downloading music, movies, TV shows, or pirating games. Now, when the copyright law is affecting them, they are gungho about protecting these billion-dollar companies' copyrights.

show 2 replies
Neywinyyesterday at 6:25 PM

I don't think it's unreasonable to consider it stolen potential profit, but agreed that's not how they spin it

blksyesterday at 7:53 PM

“Stolen” as in “profited on IP against terms and conditions of the license”.

thesmtsolver2yesterday at 7:18 PM

[dead]

themafiayesterday at 6:32 PM

[dead]