you wouldn't believe how many people cite that paper as "Wulf et al." when that's practically more characters than saying "Wulf and McKee"
I notice these things a bit more as she was my PhD thesis advisor
et al should never be applied when only two authors!!!
> you wouldn't believe how many people cite that paper as "Wulf et al." when that's practically more characters than saying "Wulf and McKee"
Wulf et al.
Wulf and McKee
35% less isn't usually described as "practically more".It'd be interesting to see someone use the unabbreviated form; I have a hunch they wouldn't know to say "et alia".
There's only two authors! That's so rude!