alt Hacker NewsThat’s understandable.
Why does the video footage need to be able to be viewed live, remotely, by a sales team and a prospective client in another state?
Predators have access to these cameras. There are numerous instances of police using these systems to stalk women.
If I want video proof of what happened at a school, I’m much more comfortable with it being held on premises in a tamper evident location. That eliminates some of the predators from the situation.
There is conflict if interest!
School is the one who allowed dogs at first place. They are not going provide footage that would make them liable! And they are banning phones, so there is no video evidence!