Such anger and contempt, for no good reason. If we're going to be calling names, I think the "twelve-year-old" moniker fits your attitude better.

> This is a core tenet of the Rawlsian religion, of which you are a (probably unwitting) fanatic.

Ouch. How warped does one's thinking have to be to call "A theory of justice" (1971) for pluralistic, democratic societies, a "religion"?

It seems to me that right-wingers love hyperbole and rhetoric, without addressing the meat of the matter.

Your post is no different, being entirely free of reason. A good day to you, Sir.

.. what?