what's the point of having 5 people doing 1 person's job though?
sounds stupid to me
The profit from the employee reduction goes to the capitalists not to labor. So it is in the best interest of workers to resist reductions in the number of workers.
delusions of having AI do those roles and the one person in charge over prompting will know the difference between quality and slop... guess which one I'm betting on?
No problem if you split the gains 50-50. 2.5x raise for the one person.