logoalt Hacker News

yummybrainzyesterday at 12:07 PM2 repliesview on HN

I'm assuming the intended meaning is that this was the first time the approach led to "realistic" sound?


Replies

Dropoutjeepyesterday at 1:36 PM

If this is their definition of "realistic" sound then I'm horrified

moralestapiayesterday at 1:21 PM

That's also not the case. There have been some really accurate physically-modeled instruments for at least 20 years.

Also, aschkually, a violin is on the "easier" end of making it sound realistic. It's one of the "tutorial" models you go through when you start learning about this (resonators + reverb get you 80% there). Much harder to do any plucking sound (guitar, piano), and much much harder to model percussions accurately (cymbals, drums) and in such a way that the sound doesn't come out dry and very evidently synthetic.

Source: I was very invested into this in the 2000s, although as a hobby, not professionally.

show 1 reply