logoalt Hacker News

therealpygonyesterday at 7:44 PM4 repliesview on HN

Why pay someone to build a house? I’m sure you could do it yourself…but that doesn’t mean that is the best use of your time in all cases. The analogy is basic but apt; not everyone needs or wants to run (or create) every mechanism. I don’t do all of my own hosting either and it’s not because I couldn’t, it’s that it isn’t worthwhile in my cases.

To expand a bit more: if a business is faced with a choice to save some money by increasing risk, having people who’s job it isn’t managing and supposedly securing that information, or to have a third-party who job is literally to handle and worry about those things, who carries independent insurance, and who is on the hook if they lose customer data, and in exchange the business is simply taking the risk of associating with business that could do a poor job — which of those options sounds more appealing from a business sense? It’s a lot easier to blame someone else than earn back trust for your own major mistakes because you tried to write your own software to save a little money.

That’s the SaaS value proposition.


Replies

the__alchemistyesterday at 9:09 PM

I see Postgres etc as the builder. Supabase is more like the realtor; a middle man extracting profits and complicating the situation.

show 1 reply
pietzyesterday at 7:59 PM

This comment is more ridiculous than ever in 2026.

show 4 replies
notatoadyesterday at 7:54 PM

>that doesn’t mean it’s the best use of your time in all cases

Okay, so… what are those cases? I’m also curious.

show 1 reply
fnoeftoday at 8:05 AM

This is such an absurd take.

For starters, if I'm a "house builder" by trade, then yeah, I am going to build the house myself. Otherwise, why should the client pay me, and not the guy I'm subcontracting?

Secondly, there is no such thing as a "house builder" profession. It consists of a lot of different trades people, some of them having legal power to sign off your house build (for example an electrician). Now, we could try to push for something similar in software engineering, and say require you to have an "authentication engineering certificate" in order to handle code related to auth, and only a person holding the certificate can allow such code for production use. But I'm pretty sure all the vibe coders and tech bros will cry how unfair and bureaucratic the system is.

But of course the entire SWE profession is based on grifting, and extracting as much money as possible from the customers while cutting the costs. If you are so afraid to save passwords to a database, then at least don't call yourself a software engineer.