alt Hacker NewsFWIW, “boiling the frog” is the example of false reasoning about slippery slopes (the frog in actuality always left)
Your larger point still stands though of normalizing changing expectations by slow degrees
FWIW, “boiling the frog” is the example of false reasoning about slippery slopes (the frog in actuality always left)
Your larger point still stands though of normalizing changing expectations by slow degrees
Not really - i would prefer that any policy change that _could_ be utilized in the future to enable future draconian changes be killed before it takes root.
I want a system, like type safety, to guarantee that XYZ cannot be possible, rather than rely on civil jurisprudence and active opposition to prevent it. We don't have that today, but i like to have it.