logoalt Hacker News

g3f32rtoday at 3:24 PM2 repliesview on HN

> You wouldn't trust an engineer a bridge that an engineer vibe-engineered would you?

If it was as easy to stress test/battery test/materials test/etc a bridge as it is to test code - then yes. I'd trust an engineer who vibe-engineered a bridge.

---

The problem with mapping digital problems into meat-space is that there is inherently a few orders of magnitude of cost automatically added to anything that happens in meat-space.

I can spin up an arbitrary number (10, 10k, 500k) docker instances, X with fuzzed inputs, Y with explicit edge cases, Z with tolerance testing, etc etc. And if that doesn't work - I can fix and push a button and it just happens again.

If a bridge engineer could do that with bridges - yes I'd expect them to be vibing just as hard as we are now.


Replies

kibatoday at 4:50 PM

That's verification. An engineer still understands the bridge and the engineering decisions that they built.

esafaktoday at 4:37 PM

Don't mechanical engineers do that with FEM simulations? Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZspM_TvPKQ