logoalt Hacker News

SunshineTheCatyesterday at 5:20 PM21 repliesview on HN

I know that I'm in a bit of a bubble with this one, but I am surprised there is still anyone using Chrome instead of Brave. I get the dependency on Gmail other Google-specific tools, but the built-in ad blocking and Google-free aspects of it made me switch instantly and haven't look back after years.


Replies

plopzyesterday at 5:51 PM

Brave started off incredibly sketchy and with terrible reputation, for example https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18734999

I haven't ever considered it since and I assume many others are in the same boat.

show 4 replies
ifh-hnyesterday at 5:41 PM

I'm similar but instead of brave, which I don't trust, prefer Firefox.

show 1 reply
skocznymrocznyyesterday at 6:30 PM

I switched to Firefox when Chrome started messing with the ad blockers. Haven't really had any issues. I prefer developer tools on Chrome but I rarely need to use them anyway.

show 3 replies
amatechayesterday at 5:56 PM

I'm just surprised people use Chrome at all. Google has proven over and over they can't be trusted and will exploit you every chance they get.

show 2 replies
vehemenzyesterday at 6:08 PM

Ok, why Brave though? There's Safari, Chromium, LibreWolf, Ladybird, and plenty of others.

show 4 replies
jeffgrecoyesterday at 5:41 PM

I was very vehement about needing to stay in Chromium — until I tried Zen browser and it turns out I didn’t! (Unless I wanted to watch Prime Video)

StilesCrisisyesterday at 8:01 PM

If you're anti-Google, use Firefox. It's hypocritical to use the browser they're paying to build, then complain about how they generate revenue to fund it.

touristtamyesterday at 7:01 PM

After years of using alternative to chrome (Firefox, Chromium, Brave, Opera, Vivaldi, Edge, etc ...) I have stopped fighting the choice of IT for installing and setting Chrome as the default browser on a Mac. I still use Firefox when I can and religiously reroute URLs to it where possible, but this is beating me down and I would rather spend time playing with LLMs rather than continue this struggle.

PufPufPufyesterday at 10:58 PM

There are other browsers that are free of both Google and sketchy cryptocurrency business!

maxlohyesterday at 6:22 PM

I find Brave's UI uglier than Chrome's.

Unfortunately, there is no way to switch back to the stock Chromium look.

blksyesterday at 7:55 PM

Brave’s owner is a very sketchy dude. With all the news that were happening around brave, all the shitcoin stuff, I wouldn’t be surprised if the browser is mining crypto.

The single affiliated link scandal is enough to not touch that project with a ten foot pole.

blksyesterday at 8:07 PM

I was using Firefox, Vivaldi, Zen, and finally got fed up with various issues that Zen was having, so I switched to Waterfox. I am very happy and the browser is very fast; difference is immense.

show 3 replies
frizlabyesterday at 6:55 PM

I use Safari personally. It’s good.

show 1 reply
afavouryesterday at 6:11 PM

You’re definitely in a bubble. Google advertises Chrome on TV. Most users haven’t even heard of Brave.

Markoffyesterday at 5:41 PM

why would you use brave with annoying crypto and no customization over superior Vivaldi?

show 2 replies
shevy-javayesterday at 6:03 PM

Well, why would I want to use Brave?

Brave is the Google empire aka chromium.

I use thorium, which also belongs to the empire, so it is not really any different to Brave - but I can use ublock origin still, so that's better. I think we are all in the Google empire here. Praising Brave as alternative, simply does not make a whole lot of sense really.

Firefox is a bit outside of it but it basically got rid of most of its users. When I use firefox, I can not play audio on youtube videos. It works fine with thorium. I tried to convince the firefox developer who said everyone on Linux must use pulseaudio (I don't) but there is no reasoning with Mozilla hackers here. He thinks he knows better than everyone else does. (I could recompile firefox from source, but Mozilla uses mozconfig still: https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/xsoft/firefox... - they are too incompetent to transition into meson or cmake. A failing project, no wonder it lost most of its users. Titanic got nothing on the Firefox team.)

RobRiverayesterday at 5:48 PM

I have never heard of Brave, please tell me more

Edit: downvoting a request for insight on something? Mediocre

show 1 reply
Brian_K_Whiteyesterday at 8:37 PM

"I am surprised there is still anyone using Chrome instead of Brave."

Bubble indeed. No one should use Brave.

coldpieyesterday at 7:19 PM

I want to use a browser engine that is not developed/owned by Google, so I use Firefox. I also don't want to support Brave's CEO's politics, so I would not use Brave regardless.

bix6yesterday at 6:05 PM

+1 for Brave. Been on it for years and it’s fantastic. Strongest security settings without issue.

O no they gave you BAT for visiting websites. Ahhh crypto everyone run!

show 1 reply
newsofthedayyesterday at 5:42 PM

My theory is that, since I'm going to do things like banking in my browser, I want one that has a lot of skin in the game. Chrome being backed by Google has trillions of dollars on the line should they ever do anything truly evil. Though this sneaky 4GB download comes close.

show 3 replies