logoalt Hacker News

mschuster91yesterday at 5:38 PM4 repliesview on HN

Either of the mentioned was at one point of their career someone who would have been considered at least belonging to "counterculture".

Unfortunately, money and power corrupts, and lo and behold, one day you wake up to find you have become the very thing you once swore to destroy.


Replies

smsm42yesterday at 10:09 PM

Maybe, some of them were poor young iconoclasts some day. That's not when they joined the fashionable trend of Burning Man though. When they joined their trend, they were well into their power (or at least, in the case of somebody like Holmes, pretense of it). Because that's what is fashionable, of course, and they couldn't afford not to be part of "counter-culture" - it's so gauche not to be part of it!

RobotToasteryesterday at 7:42 PM

Power doesn't corrupt, it reveals.

47282847yesterday at 6:33 PM

All of the people mentioned have been in millionaire to billionaire families since birth, so based on that alone I am not sure I work with the same definition of “counterculture” as you are.

show 1 reply
eastboundyesterday at 6:40 PM

Maybe wisdom gives another perspective on the ideals we had in our youth?

show 2 replies