Unfortunately we're probably still quite far from that. This is the best case for LLMs still - the quality of their output didn't matter as long as it worked, and there was a near-perfect oracle for checking if their output worked.

That's a really good use case for LLMs. It also applies to things like finding proofs in Lean and creating test stimulus. In both cases you know automatically whether the output is good, and it doesn't really matter if it isn't.

That isn't the case for most bugs, and definitely isn't the case for actually fixing bugs.

> Firefox deserves to be used more

Totally agree. I even go as far as choosing which website I make purchases on depending if they work on FF, or writing to support occasionally to tell them it's not supported or a feature isn't working properly and this would be appreciated.

I know it pretty much always goes nowhere, but I feel it's what I can do to keep the browser somehow on the radar.

> Firefox deserves to be used more

Part of the problem is, when they stop working on fixing bugs, they start doing Mr Robot things... We just want a web browser. Nobody asked for pocket, or AI...

If they use AI to fix all the bugs, then what else is for them to do, other than maintain syntax compatibility with the various languages they build with? They're just going to go back to making the browser trash again.

Chrome ain't better in any meaningful way for >99% of use cases. Heck, I am a dev and I use FF with ublock origin only, for past... 10 years?

Same with my wife, after I've explained things to her and she understood how different internet experience can be thats the primary browser.

So please don't put the argument like 'here is crappy underdog but please use it because monopoly is bad and google is a bit evil', its first class experience in everything I have ever thrown at it. Tripple that on mobile, by far the best mobile and useful mobile experience, bar none.