logoalt Hacker News

kevcampbyesterday at 9:30 PM5 repliesview on HN

This seems somewhat specious - it's also quite possible that they just altered the wording to make it less verbose. Does anyone have access to the link "Learn more about on-device AI"?

If Chrome starts sending data from the browser back to Google, that's going to be a huge compliance issue. If you work for a company that processes customer data in the browser, you're going to need to ban Chrome.


Replies

decimalenoughyesterday at 10:38 PM

Chrome has been recording metadata (URLs, timestamps, etc) about your activity since forever, and you can turn this off if you like, see https://myactivity.google.com/myactivity.

They don't record data (POSTs etc).

show 2 replies
twelvedogstoday at 1:14 AM

it already sends data back to google, the ai stuff, everything that goes in the address bar goes straight to google unless you specifically configure chrome to block it

the on-device ai just offloads some work onto your device

i doubt anyone will be banning chrome, for some reason "it's for ai" is a valid excuse for any amount of sillyness

orthecreedencetoday at 3:11 AM

Yeah, I staunchly refuse to believe an ad company that releases a closed-source browser would violate our privacy. You're probably right that they changed the claim simply because it was too verbose. That's the best and only explanation.

LtWorfyesterday at 10:31 PM

Chrome has been doing that since the beginning.

xbaryesterday at 9:33 PM

Good idea.