No building has a 100% chance of not caving in, yet somehow I think charges would be laid if a skyscraper caved in.
This analogy seems to be portraying 'ransomware hackers' as an unstoppable force of nature akin to gravity.
I'm not sure that's a fair analogy.
The equivalent analogy is charging lock/door/drywall/timber makers and suppliers for lapses if a thief entered the house by picking a lock or drilling/sawing through the wall.