logoalt Hacker News

cpursleyyesterday at 1:21 PM4 repliesview on HN

They weren’t occupied by Russia, but the USSR which was an authoritarian communist state. That entire economic system failed for a reason, and the Chinese were wise to pivot (and not try spreading its ideology by force).


Replies

10xDevyesterday at 1:34 PM

Yeah, I really don't think this is why China doesn't try to spread its ideology by force. I don't think a passive authoritarian state exists, just ones that don't have the military power or background / weak enough targets to achieve this. The US very much keeps them in check from invading not "wisdom".

show 1 reply
kubobleyesterday at 1:53 PM

Big parts of Poland have been occupied by a regime in Moscow for much longer than soviet empire existed, with roughly same outcomes.

Most than century after Poland gained independence age WW1, you can still see the economical differences from being occupied by Germans and Russians.

show 1 reply
victorbjorklundyesterday at 1:41 PM

According to Russians they are the contineuation of USSR. heck they are celebrating victory day claiming they were the red army.

show 1 reply
ponectoryesterday at 3:01 PM

Also USSR was never an authoritarian communist state. They had elected leaders!

Unless Moscow is not part of russia you can't say they weren't occupied by russia.

show 2 replies