logoalt Hacker News

mitchell_hyesterday at 2:10 PM1 replyview on HN

I think it's proper. When you release something like this, a raw data dump is the only way to cut out a BUNCH of the "this is modified and falsified" noise.


Replies

rustyhancockyesterday at 2:15 PM

Yes. Importantly just because they've processed it conveniently doesn't mean they'd ever intend to share that.

My first thought when I saw this is how much will it cost me to kick it up to a HF I stance.

I did a trial run with the Epstein files and it was genuinely fun to catch a few bits before the media caught up.

Not to mention that if they add any metadata thats just increasing their exposure and they will be held to what the LLMs label it.