alt Hacker News>This is so debunked that I consider other opinions held by you as a sign they are wrong as well
"So debunked" by whom exactly?
Please cite which parts of this report[1] you believe are false.
Insofar as this discussion is concerned, I'll defer to the Cato institute, a conservative think tank. Quote:
"Mueller concluded that the Russians did interfere, Trump was aware of the interference, he benefited from and encouraged the interference – e.g., Don, Jr. was eager to get and use information on Hillary Clinton – and he didn’t report the interference to the FBI. "
That's the part pertinent to this discussion. Namely, that Russia did help MAGA in the US grow, and there's documented evidence of that.
Russia's influence on rural Polish conservatives in stoking the anti-Ukrainian and anti-EU sentiment, and their open meddling in the politics of EU countries supporting MAGA-like sentiments in Hungary, Slovakia, and Poland, is similarly well-documented.
I'm sorry that you appear to be triggered by seeing a reference to Muller's report.
The points I'm making still stand though, and I hope you'll find the strength to comprehend them in spite of your reflexes.
Thank you in advance.