None of those 4 look like AI slop to me. They lack the strange non-sequitur nature these contrasting statements generally have when made by AI. The version of the third example I would expect from a clanker would be more like

> It's not about utility. It's not even really about the chatbot. It's about novelty of talking to a machine

Which of course doesn't connect to the rest of the article contents, because the AI doesn't have any intention in its writing.